:.
Big GC shuffle after the first time trial
Le contre la montre. The race of truth. The individual time trial. Today saw Stage 4 of le Tour 2008, and although it was short in duration, it was long on impact. The racing is off to a great start as we saw the third yellow jersey of the race in only four stages---and no doping allegations yet! Viva le Tour 2008.
Going into the action today it was French hero-of-the-day Romain Feillu who stole yellow from Valverde in Stage 3. In that stage the sprinters' teams let the four-man break have their way, which was a maximum lead of 15 minutes. At 50 km to go they still had about an eight minute advantage, and the catch seemed unlikely. Indeed it was not to happen, and Feillu and his fellow escapees took the stage with Feillu taking both time and the yellow jersey from Valverde.
Time to ante up
With the short time trial (29.5 km) any one rider's losses would be limited. However we mentioned yesterday that it would still create a pecking order among the GC contenders, as well as present an opportunity for serious competitors to ante up to the table and take a few (or more) precious seconds from their rivals. Accordingly, GC riders like Cadell Evans, Denis Menchov, and Kim Kirchen came out swinging and "attacked" each other and their rivals with the clock.
The hot pre-race favorites were Fabian Cancellara and David Millar, two time-trial specialists who have performed well previously. In fact Cancellara is the reigning world time trial champ. It was a nearly flat course, with only a few bumps in the road to break it up slightly. This neutralized the climbers and favored the time trial specialists like Cancellara and Millar. Sadly but not surpisingly, overnight French hero Feillu lost out a bit, giving 4:59 to the eventual winner and new maillot jaune Stefan Schumacher.
Next stop: Super Besse
It was a very tight race with the top ten finishing within 47 seconds of each other. That is a deep field and rearranges the standings just in time for the first mountain stage on Thursday. Schumacher is an interesting maillot jaune. He won two stages in the 2006 Giro d'Italia, won the Amstel Gold Race in 2007, and was third in the World Champs the same year. So he has had some success, and appears to be a budding all 'rounder whose climbing ability will be tested in Stage 6 this year. He will defend the jersey vehemently, but remains enough of an unknown to make it unpredictable up the two Category 2 climbs, where there will be plenty of attacks as riders test each other and try to gain more time.
Only one minute separates places 2-9 from yellow. Among the top ten, the only likely contenders are Kirchen, Millar, Evans, and Menchov (11th). And even among them Millar's climbing has always been inconsistent and not his strength. Team Garmin-Chipotle also have Christian Vandevelde, who can be a good climber but has never performed that well in the grand tours. Having said that, however, Garmin-Chipotle is in a superb position. They are a wild card entry this year with zero expectations, and have gone from strength to strength since the start of the year. Yesterday they nearly won the stage (2nd) and again today Millar placed highly (3rd).
But Evans is the big winner from the Stage 4 time trial. He sits currently in 4th place, 21 s behind Schumacher but only nine seconds behind Millar and Kirchen. Furthermore, he is over one minute clear of Alejandro Valverde and 1:20 ahead of Carlos Sastre, two Spanish climbers and favorites of many to take yellow in Paris. Obviously Millar and Kirchen can match Evans in the race of truth, but surely Evans will climb better than both of them. With his team throwing their support behind him and leaving sprinting legend Robbie McEwen to fend for himself, Evans then looks able to take and defend the yellow jersey.
Le Tour 2008: We like it!
It has been a great tour so far, with three lead changes and a likely fourth change on Thursday. The Super Besse stage on that day will no doubt produce another shake up as the yellow jersey will be attacked on the final climb (or even before). Add to this the fact that it is a mountain top finish, where time losses can be decisive, and you have a winning combination for some fantastic racing, with a rider like Evans possibly amassing a substantial lead over his rivals. Look for Silence-Lotto to try to deal a knockout blow to the likes of Valverde and Sastre and perhaps even Menchov. If not, the pressure is firmly on them to make up the 40+ seconds they owe to the Australian.
Roll on Stage 6 and Super Besse!
Selasa, 08 Juli 2008
Senin, 07 Juli 2008
le Tour de France 2008: Feed them well
Why eating is important
The 2008 edition of le grande boucle, as it is affectionately known, is now fully underway, and so far each stage has been quite exciting. The tour started without the traditional prologue, and instead was a full on stage. It's slightly uphill finish effectively neutralized the sprinters, and so it was not surprising to see all the main GC contenders at the front. In fact Alejandro Valverde won the stage and took yellow, although we spoke about how much of a challenge it would be to go "wire to wire" in yellow.
Sunday's Stage 2 had its fair share of bumps with four categorized climbs and also a slightly uphill finish. It seemed that again the sprinters would be neutralized, and it was Fabian Cancellara that attacked with one km to go. He could not hold it, though, and even Valverde had a go, but also faded. In the end a big man took victory---Thor Hushovd from Norway powered across the line for his fifth stage win in le Tour. Valverde remained in yellow, however.
During the first two stages there were crashes as the riders passed through the feedzones. These are designated areas where support crew hold out bags full of food and drink. The riders slow down a bit and grab them as they whiz by. Fortunately Stage 3 saw no crashes in the feed zones, but let's looks at why it is so important to eat on the bike.
Energy balance
We can all agree that the energy demands placed on tour riders are pretty astronomical, but it makes more sense to break it down into a specific context. Therefore let's take your "average" 75 kg cyclist and his daily energy demands. His resting metabolic rate, or RMR, is the amount of energy he requires to sit there do nothing all day long. In other words, it is the energy required by his body to maintain all of its life-sustaining functions. For him it is around 1500 calories.
But our cyclist is not just sitting there all day. . .in fact, he is covering upwards of 180 km per stage, often with significant uphill sections which require more energy. Cycling is a pretty efficient activity, however, and it costs our cyclist in the range of 0.3-0.4 calories per km cycled per kg of body mass---or about 25-30 calories per km. The bottom line here is that a 180 km stage will cost our athlete around 4000 calories, depending on the amount of drafting.
It's a lot of cheeseburgers!
Any way you calculate it, our cyclist's total energy expenditure for one day of the tour is very high. His RMR (1500 cal) plus his exercising energy expenditure (4000 cal) adds up to a whopping 5500 calories, which is probably the equivalent of 15+ cheeseburgers! So just to remain in energy balance our rider must consume 5000+ calories a day. Believe us when we say it: that is a lot of food. Add to this the fact that he is on the bike for four or more hours during the day, plus the "anorexic effect" of exercise, plus 8-10 hours of sleep. Suddenly he has only a relatively small window of time to consume large amounts or calories.
If we assume he is otherwise occupied for up to 16 hours a day with riding, sleeping, and other activities, he has only about 7-8 h to ingest 5500 calories, which works out to about 700+ calories an hour during the time he is available to eat and drink. So remaining in energy balance is actually a huge challenge for our tour rider.
Fortunately the race organizers allow the cyclists to grab the feed bags and eat while riding. This is crucial for two reasons. First, it provides more opportunity to choke down a portion of the 5500 calories he needs in a day. Second, the ingestion of carbohydrates during exercise prevents the dreaded "bonk," or hypoglycemia. Many of you probably have bonked before, and therefore you know that when it happens you are finished---no more racing for the day as you limp home and consume gross quantities of food along the way to fill the hole in your tummy!
How much to eat then?
Klaas Westerterp and his colleagues in Maastricht (Netherlands) actually measured the energy intake and estimated the energy expenditure in five cyclists in the 1988 Tour de France. Their average intake was almost 6000 calories per day, while their average expenditure was nearly 6100 calories per day---indicating that these cyclists did a remarkable job of (nearly) maintaining energy balance. They accomplished this by ingesting 49% of their energy while riding, which amounted to whopping 94 g of CHO per hour during each stage! Furthermore, a full 30% of their carbohydrate intake was in fluid form, which makes it substantially easier to meet energy requirements during the 7-8 h when they are not racing or otherwise occupied.
Given this information now, it should now make total sense when you watch the riders rolling through the French countryside, shoving energy bars and other products down their gullets. Hungry or not, they must get the calories into their bodies. Failure to do so will almost certainly result in fatigue and an early exit from the race, because when cycling four or more hours each day it does not take long to accrue a serious energy deficit. When your body does not get enough energy, cycling four hours or more a day becomes an unnecessary activity, and our bodies have an uncanny way of keeping us healthy---suddenly getting on the bike and pedaling requires substantial effort, more so than a few days ago, and eventually you will not be able to keep up with the bunch.
Stay tuned to le Tour---plenty of action ahead
Looking ahead to Tuesday's stage, we see the first individual time trial. It is a pancake flat 29 km ride and will do two things. First, it will create a pecking order for those who will contend for the GC. Second, it will limit any one rider's gains or losses as the distance is so short, and therefore the race should remain close and within reach for the contenders. It also will set the stage for Stage 6 on Thursday, which is the tour's first mountain top finish, and is sure to produce some fireworks!
The 2008 edition of le grande boucle, as it is affectionately known, is now fully underway, and so far each stage has been quite exciting. The tour started without the traditional prologue, and instead was a full on stage. It's slightly uphill finish effectively neutralized the sprinters, and so it was not surprising to see all the main GC contenders at the front. In fact Alejandro Valverde won the stage and took yellow, although we spoke about how much of a challenge it would be to go "wire to wire" in yellow.
Sunday's Stage 2 had its fair share of bumps with four categorized climbs and also a slightly uphill finish. It seemed that again the sprinters would be neutralized, and it was Fabian Cancellara that attacked with one km to go. He could not hold it, though, and even Valverde had a go, but also faded. In the end a big man took victory---Thor Hushovd from Norway powered across the line for his fifth stage win in le Tour. Valverde remained in yellow, however.
During the first two stages there were crashes as the riders passed through the feedzones. These are designated areas where support crew hold out bags full of food and drink. The riders slow down a bit and grab them as they whiz by. Fortunately Stage 3 saw no crashes in the feed zones, but let's looks at why it is so important to eat on the bike.
Energy balance
We can all agree that the energy demands placed on tour riders are pretty astronomical, but it makes more sense to break it down into a specific context. Therefore let's take your "average" 75 kg cyclist and his daily energy demands. His resting metabolic rate, or RMR, is the amount of energy he requires to sit there do nothing all day long. In other words, it is the energy required by his body to maintain all of its life-sustaining functions. For him it is around 1500 calories.
But our cyclist is not just sitting there all day. . .in fact, he is covering upwards of 180 km per stage, often with significant uphill sections which require more energy. Cycling is a pretty efficient activity, however, and it costs our cyclist in the range of 0.3-0.4 calories per km cycled per kg of body mass---or about 25-30 calories per km. The bottom line here is that a 180 km stage will cost our athlete around 4000 calories, depending on the amount of drafting.
It's a lot of cheeseburgers!
Any way you calculate it, our cyclist's total energy expenditure for one day of the tour is very high. His RMR (1500 cal) plus his exercising energy expenditure (4000 cal) adds up to a whopping 5500 calories, which is probably the equivalent of 15+ cheeseburgers! So just to remain in energy balance our rider must consume 5000+ calories a day. Believe us when we say it: that is a lot of food. Add to this the fact that he is on the bike for four or more hours during the day, plus the "anorexic effect" of exercise, plus 8-10 hours of sleep. Suddenly he has only a relatively small window of time to consume large amounts or calories.
If we assume he is otherwise occupied for up to 16 hours a day with riding, sleeping, and other activities, he has only about 7-8 h to ingest 5500 calories, which works out to about 700+ calories an hour during the time he is available to eat and drink. So remaining in energy balance is actually a huge challenge for our tour rider.
Fortunately the race organizers allow the cyclists to grab the feed bags and eat while riding. This is crucial for two reasons. First, it provides more opportunity to choke down a portion of the 5500 calories he needs in a day. Second, the ingestion of carbohydrates during exercise prevents the dreaded "bonk," or hypoglycemia. Many of you probably have bonked before, and therefore you know that when it happens you are finished---no more racing for the day as you limp home and consume gross quantities of food along the way to fill the hole in your tummy!
How much to eat then?
Klaas Westerterp and his colleagues in Maastricht (Netherlands) actually measured the energy intake and estimated the energy expenditure in five cyclists in the 1988 Tour de France. Their average intake was almost 6000 calories per day, while their average expenditure was nearly 6100 calories per day---indicating that these cyclists did a remarkable job of (nearly) maintaining energy balance. They accomplished this by ingesting 49% of their energy while riding, which amounted to whopping 94 g of CHO per hour during each stage! Furthermore, a full 30% of their carbohydrate intake was in fluid form, which makes it substantially easier to meet energy requirements during the 7-8 h when they are not racing or otherwise occupied.
Given this information now, it should now make total sense when you watch the riders rolling through the French countryside, shoving energy bars and other products down their gullets. Hungry or not, they must get the calories into their bodies. Failure to do so will almost certainly result in fatigue and an early exit from the race, because when cycling four or more hours each day it does not take long to accrue a serious energy deficit. When your body does not get enough energy, cycling four hours or more a day becomes an unnecessary activity, and our bodies have an uncanny way of keeping us healthy---suddenly getting on the bike and pedaling requires substantial effort, more so than a few days ago, and eventually you will not be able to keep up with the bunch.
Stay tuned to le Tour---plenty of action ahead
Looking ahead to Tuesday's stage, we see the first individual time trial. It is a pancake flat 29 km ride and will do two things. First, it will create a pecking order for those who will contend for the GC. Second, it will limit any one rider's gains or losses as the distance is so short, and therefore the race should remain close and within reach for the contenders. It also will set the stage for Stage 6 on Thursday, which is the tour's first mountain top finish, and is sure to produce some fireworks!
Minggu, 06 Juli 2008
Welcome to www.sportsscientists.com
The Science of Sport takes another step forward
This is just a very short post to update all of our readers about a new step we have taken here at The Science of Sport. We have continued to grow each month of our 15-month existence, adding more subscribers and visitors each month that goes by. So thanks to all of you who keep on coming back, and to all of our news readers who subscribe each day. And now we are pleased to announce that we now have our own domain name!
www.sportsscientists.com
Recently some of you may have now noticed that the address in your browser now reads www.sportsscientists.com. While we hope this gives us more recognition and helps build our "brand," we can say that thanks to the work of Blogger and Google this transition is entirely seamless for you and also for us. That means the move to the new domain name does not affect anyone. If your browser was bookmarked at http://scienceofsport.blogspot.com, then Blogger will simply redirect you to the new site. So there is absolutely nothing you must do to continue receiving our content here on the blog or via email!
An action-packed sporting period
Meanwhile, we will admittedly struggle to keep pace with all the happenings in the world of sport. For two guys with day jobs and with Jonathan's first baby arriving any day now (and we mean any day!), posting on the USA Track and Field Olympic Trials, USA Swimming Olympic Trials, Kenyan Olympic trials, Euro 2008, Wimbledon, and the Tour de France will prove too much to cover in a timely fashion. So apologies now, we will try to keep pace, but know now that some of the news and analysis will slip through the cracks. The Science of Sport is indeed a passion for us, but also a part-time endeavor for now.
We are watching it all, however, and will post on what we can each week. It is an exciting time for sports especially with Beijing now only about four weeks away!
This is just a very short post to update all of our readers about a new step we have taken here at The Science of Sport. We have continued to grow each month of our 15-month existence, adding more subscribers and visitors each month that goes by. So thanks to all of you who keep on coming back, and to all of our news readers who subscribe each day. And now we are pleased to announce that we now have our own domain name!
www.sportsscientists.com
Recently some of you may have now noticed that the address in your browser now reads www.sportsscientists.com. While we hope this gives us more recognition and helps build our "brand," we can say that thanks to the work of Blogger and Google this transition is entirely seamless for you and also for us. That means the move to the new domain name does not affect anyone. If your browser was bookmarked at http://scienceofsport.blogspot.com, then Blogger will simply redirect you to the new site. So there is absolutely nothing you must do to continue receiving our content here on the blog or via email!
An action-packed sporting period
Meanwhile, we will admittedly struggle to keep pace with all the happenings in the world of sport. For two guys with day jobs and with Jonathan's first baby arriving any day now (and we mean any day!), posting on the USA Track and Field Olympic Trials, USA Swimming Olympic Trials, Kenyan Olympic trials, Euro 2008, Wimbledon, and the Tour de France will prove too much to cover in a timely fashion. So apologies now, we will try to keep pace, but know now that some of the news and analysis will slip through the cracks. The Science of Sport is indeed a passion for us, but also a part-time endeavor for now.
We are watching it all, however, and will post on what we can each week. It is an exciting time for sports especially with Beijing now only about four weeks away!
Sabtu, 05 Juli 2008
Tour de France 2008 Stage 1
Valverde wins Stage 1: An early statement, but a physiological challenge awaits
Spain's Alejandro Valverde won the opening stage of the 2008 Tour de France today, winning a tough uphill sprint finish into Plumelec. The Spaniard is clearly in great form - he won Liege-Bastogne-Liege and the Dauphine Libere earlier this season, and has carried that form into the first sprint finish of the Tour, though it was hardly a pure sprinter stage.
The tough finish ensured that most of the pure sprinters were dropped before the final kilometer, and a brief scan down the results shows that only Thor Hushovd and Fabian Cancellara (a sprinter at a stretch, admittedly) were able to remain in close proximity to the leaders. The final kilometer saw attack after attack going off the front of a relatively disordered peleton, and Kim Kirchen of Luxembourg looked to have made a decisive move with about 500m to go. But Valverde was able to bridge the gap and then move clear to take his stage victory, and also the leader's yellow jersey, since there were no time bonuses for the sprinters to snap up earlier on the stage.
Valverde's win, apart from confirmation that he is in great condition right at the moment, also presents him with a few conundrum's for the next couple of weeks, both tactical and physiological.
Firstly, to be in the leader's Yellow Jersey after day 1 of a Tour where he, along with Cadel Evans, is really the BIG favourite for the overall GC, means added pressure on him and his team. He was relatively dismissive of that pressure, saying that "I have no extra pressure now, I have already achieved two of my objectives in this Tour; wearing yellow and winning a stage".
And of course, defending that jersey will be far from the front of his mind right now, since there are fully two weeks to go before the Alpine stages begin, and that is likely where the Tour will be won and lost. I don't see any decisive days in the Pyrenees, at least for victory. The Tour may be lost in the Pyrenees, but it will be won in the Alps. So in that respect, Valverde is right.
Also, there is almost inevitably going to be a successful break-away in the first week, and given the tough, hilly nature of the first week, that break could well throw up the race's next maillot jaune. Failing that, the time-trial on Tuesday will probably see a change in leader, since it's a relatively short time-trial (29 km) and Cancellara is only seven seconds down.
Point is, Valverde's prospects of going wire to wire to win the race seem slim, tactically speaking. And this is a good thing, because to do this physiologically is very tough.
I must confess that I was initially surprised at the presence of both he and Cadel Evans at the very front of the peloton in the sprint today. Evans finished sixth, only one second back. However, the way the race unfolded, the strong men had to come to the front, because in the end, only thirteen men finished in the first group, with a further 35 back by 7 seconds. So on reflection, their presence is perhaps not that surprising, and is merely a reflection on the quality of the ride required to remain in contention on today's finish. However, what is still surprising to me is thier contention for the stage win.
As much as I'm not a Lance-apologist (sorry...), one thing (among many, admittedly) that Armstrong got right for the Tour de France was the allocation of effort over the three weeks of racing. Would he have fought hard for the win on the opening day of the Tour? Maybe...interesting to speculate without ever really figuring out an answer.
Physiologically, however, one has to look at Valverde and question whether it's possible to ride a three-week stage race effectively having won a single-day-classic earlier this year, then winning Dauphine Libere three weeks ago, and now racing at the sharp edge of the peloton on day ONE of the main race. That kind of sustained performance level is very difficult to achieve.
In his fantastic book "Lance Armstrong's War" (also released as "Tour de Force", in SA anyway), Daniel Coyle wrote about how cyclists remain "on the razor's edge" in their training - they are always a micrometer from going too hard, pushing beyond the limits of recovery and failing into what in physiology is called an "over-reached" state. Over-reaching rapidly becomes over-training, which I'm sure most readers will have heard of.
Now, it's impossible to say without any data, so we're speculating as wildly as the next person, but is it possible to be in Classics shape in April and May, then stage race shape in June, and still remain on top form well into July? I suspect not, and so my prediction for Valverde is that he features very highly in the first 10 days of the Tour - a Pyrenean mountain stage win is a distinct possibility, but his razor's edge will come in the Alps, when his challenge falls away. Evans, who has been showing signs of form the whole year, is likely, in my view, to get stronger as the race progresses, and I would pick him as the favourite.
Time will tell, however, and it promises to be a great race. Not to mention the other four or five big contenders, like Cunego (7 seconds down today) and Schleck. Tuesday should be the first real indication.
Ross
Spain's Alejandro Valverde won the opening stage of the 2008 Tour de France today, winning a tough uphill sprint finish into Plumelec. The Spaniard is clearly in great form - he won Liege-Bastogne-Liege and the Dauphine Libere earlier this season, and has carried that form into the first sprint finish of the Tour, though it was hardly a pure sprinter stage.
The tough finish ensured that most of the pure sprinters were dropped before the final kilometer, and a brief scan down the results shows that only Thor Hushovd and Fabian Cancellara (a sprinter at a stretch, admittedly) were able to remain in close proximity to the leaders. The final kilometer saw attack after attack going off the front of a relatively disordered peleton, and Kim Kirchen of Luxembourg looked to have made a decisive move with about 500m to go. But Valverde was able to bridge the gap and then move clear to take his stage victory, and also the leader's yellow jersey, since there were no time bonuses for the sprinters to snap up earlier on the stage.
Valverde's win, apart from confirmation that he is in great condition right at the moment, also presents him with a few conundrum's for the next couple of weeks, both tactical and physiological.
Firstly, to be in the leader's Yellow Jersey after day 1 of a Tour where he, along with Cadel Evans, is really the BIG favourite for the overall GC, means added pressure on him and his team. He was relatively dismissive of that pressure, saying that "I have no extra pressure now, I have already achieved two of my objectives in this Tour; wearing yellow and winning a stage".
And of course, defending that jersey will be far from the front of his mind right now, since there are fully two weeks to go before the Alpine stages begin, and that is likely where the Tour will be won and lost. I don't see any decisive days in the Pyrenees, at least for victory. The Tour may be lost in the Pyrenees, but it will be won in the Alps. So in that respect, Valverde is right.
Also, there is almost inevitably going to be a successful break-away in the first week, and given the tough, hilly nature of the first week, that break could well throw up the race's next maillot jaune. Failing that, the time-trial on Tuesday will probably see a change in leader, since it's a relatively short time-trial (29 km) and Cancellara is only seven seconds down.
Point is, Valverde's prospects of going wire to wire to win the race seem slim, tactically speaking. And this is a good thing, because to do this physiologically is very tough.
I must confess that I was initially surprised at the presence of both he and Cadel Evans at the very front of the peloton in the sprint today. Evans finished sixth, only one second back. However, the way the race unfolded, the strong men had to come to the front, because in the end, only thirteen men finished in the first group, with a further 35 back by 7 seconds. So on reflection, their presence is perhaps not that surprising, and is merely a reflection on the quality of the ride required to remain in contention on today's finish. However, what is still surprising to me is thier contention for the stage win.
As much as I'm not a Lance-apologist (sorry...), one thing (among many, admittedly) that Armstrong got right for the Tour de France was the allocation of effort over the three weeks of racing. Would he have fought hard for the win on the opening day of the Tour? Maybe...interesting to speculate without ever really figuring out an answer.
Physiologically, however, one has to look at Valverde and question whether it's possible to ride a three-week stage race effectively having won a single-day-classic earlier this year, then winning Dauphine Libere three weeks ago, and now racing at the sharp edge of the peloton on day ONE of the main race. That kind of sustained performance level is very difficult to achieve.
In his fantastic book "Lance Armstrong's War" (also released as "Tour de Force", in SA anyway), Daniel Coyle wrote about how cyclists remain "on the razor's edge" in their training - they are always a micrometer from going too hard, pushing beyond the limits of recovery and failing into what in physiology is called an "over-reached" state. Over-reaching rapidly becomes over-training, which I'm sure most readers will have heard of.
Now, it's impossible to say without any data, so we're speculating as wildly as the next person, but is it possible to be in Classics shape in April and May, then stage race shape in June, and still remain on top form well into July? I suspect not, and so my prediction for Valverde is that he features very highly in the first 10 days of the Tour - a Pyrenean mountain stage win is a distinct possibility, but his razor's edge will come in the Alps, when his challenge falls away. Evans, who has been showing signs of form the whole year, is likely, in my view, to get stronger as the race progresses, and I would pick him as the favourite.
Time will tell, however, and it promises to be a great race. Not to mention the other four or five big contenders, like Cunego (7 seconds down today) and Schleck. Tuesday should be the first real indication.
Ross
Kamis, 03 Juli 2008
le Tour de France weekend preview
The Tour de France - the 'sparring' begins
This weekend is one of the great sporting weekends, as always, because it's usually the start of the Tour de France, and the end of Wimbledon. And so for a "newsy-opinion" post, I thought I'd preview these two events.
First is the Tour de France preview, and below it, you can find some discussion around Wimbledon, where the chance of a Roger Federer-Rafael Nadal finals rematch is still on!
But first, Le Tour de France...
Opening salvo
The Tour gets underway in Brest this weekend, and let's hope for a clean Tour with the bike-racing dominating the news rather than the doping, as we wrote yesterday!
For the first time in many years, we start with a mass ride, not a Prologue Time-trial, which means the first yellow jersey wearer is unlikely to be a Fabian Cancellara-type Time-trial specialist, but a strong sprinter - the stakes on that first finish line sprint will be huge! It's not a pure sprinter's stage, however, because it's hardly flat, and it will be one of the strong men of the race who survives a few jagged climbs who takes out the win - perhaps Cancellara is the man to watch, after all. I'd go with Robbie McEwen, however, as this year's first maillot jaune, because he's one sprinter who is capable of hanging on a tough day, especially so early in the Tour.
Tuesday sees the first real test for the big GC contenders, in the form of a short, 29.5 km Time-trial in Cholet. The Time-trials are very short this year, which will play into the hands of the climbers, though the Tour is, I must be honest, a little short of pedigreed climbing specialists who are capable of sustaining that level for the full three weeks. There are certainly climbers, but none who jump out as a Pantani-type overall champion. Soler Hernandez, last year's King of the Mountains will likely feature. But here again, the KoM title will go to the guy who is a good climber but also unlikely to feature in the GC, because he's given free reign to go out and accumulate points without intefering with the "real" race. I've always thought they should award bigger time-bonuses to reward the climbers a little more...
Plenty of 'snipers' and once-off stage winners are expected, but not repeat-stage winners, even in the sprinters, where the race lacks a real "boss". Robbie McEwen, for example, will have to fight for himself in the sprints, because his Lotto team are throwing all their weight behind Cadel Evans for the overall title. This, plus the absence of Tom Boonen due to his cocaine-liaison, means a wide open race on the flat stages.
GC contenders - an open race but with two prominent names
The two names to look out for must be Valverde and Evans, who've shown form all year. Evans also knows what it takes to compete in the Tour, having finished a brave second last year, and having fought with Contador and Rasmussen all the way through the mountains. Valverde fought in patches, and was particularly good in the Alps (as he has been a few times), but has never really carried that through to Paris. Perhaps his maturity and more experience will help him this time around.
This time round, the riders go anti-clockwise, which means they tackle the Pyrenees first, and the Alps only in the second week. Some great stages lie ahead, including the Alp d'Huez climb on July 23rd. France's Bastille day, July 14th, also sees a great stage with a finish on top of Hautacam, after the climb of the legendary Tormalet. This stage is really going to be the first indication of who has the real yellow-jersey credentials.
We'll look at specific stages once the race is underway, as we preview or review the action (time permitting, of course).
But, since we're never shy for a prediction, however incorrect, we'll call Evans as this year's champion, with the other contenders to follow - that's a "run with the herd prediction!"
One final article on cycling, to follow up on yesterday's post on cycling's drug culture. We received the following story from George, which grows (pardon the pun) the legend of doping history of the Tour de France:
When Pierre Brambilla (a well known user of amphetamines)lost to Jean Robic on the last day of the Tour in 1947 he reportedly buried his bike at the bottom of his garden. When asked by a reporter about the incident, he replied sarcastically it was to grow bamboo for a new pair of wheels. "Good job you didn't plant your feeding bottles then," the journalist replied, "You'd have grown a pharmacy."
Join us for race opinion over the next three weeks!
Ross
This weekend is one of the great sporting weekends, as always, because it's usually the start of the Tour de France, and the end of Wimbledon. And so for a "newsy-opinion" post, I thought I'd preview these two events.
First is the Tour de France preview, and below it, you can find some discussion around Wimbledon, where the chance of a Roger Federer-Rafael Nadal finals rematch is still on!
But first, Le Tour de France...
Opening salvo
The Tour gets underway in Brest this weekend, and let's hope for a clean Tour with the bike-racing dominating the news rather than the doping, as we wrote yesterday!
For the first time in many years, we start with a mass ride, not a Prologue Time-trial, which means the first yellow jersey wearer is unlikely to be a Fabian Cancellara-type Time-trial specialist, but a strong sprinter - the stakes on that first finish line sprint will be huge! It's not a pure sprinter's stage, however, because it's hardly flat, and it will be one of the strong men of the race who survives a few jagged climbs who takes out the win - perhaps Cancellara is the man to watch, after all. I'd go with Robbie McEwen, however, as this year's first maillot jaune, because he's one sprinter who is capable of hanging on a tough day, especially so early in the Tour.
Tuesday sees the first real test for the big GC contenders, in the form of a short, 29.5 km Time-trial in Cholet. The Time-trials are very short this year, which will play into the hands of the climbers, though the Tour is, I must be honest, a little short of pedigreed climbing specialists who are capable of sustaining that level for the full three weeks. There are certainly climbers, but none who jump out as a Pantani-type overall champion. Soler Hernandez, last year's King of the Mountains will likely feature. But here again, the KoM title will go to the guy who is a good climber but also unlikely to feature in the GC, because he's given free reign to go out and accumulate points without intefering with the "real" race. I've always thought they should award bigger time-bonuses to reward the climbers a little more...
Plenty of 'snipers' and once-off stage winners are expected, but not repeat-stage winners, even in the sprinters, where the race lacks a real "boss". Robbie McEwen, for example, will have to fight for himself in the sprints, because his Lotto team are throwing all their weight behind Cadel Evans for the overall title. This, plus the absence of Tom Boonen due to his cocaine-liaison, means a wide open race on the flat stages.
GC contenders - an open race but with two prominent names
The two names to look out for must be Valverde and Evans, who've shown form all year. Evans also knows what it takes to compete in the Tour, having finished a brave second last year, and having fought with Contador and Rasmussen all the way through the mountains. Valverde fought in patches, and was particularly good in the Alps (as he has been a few times), but has never really carried that through to Paris. Perhaps his maturity and more experience will help him this time around.
This time round, the riders go anti-clockwise, which means they tackle the Pyrenees first, and the Alps only in the second week. Some great stages lie ahead, including the Alp d'Huez climb on July 23rd. France's Bastille day, July 14th, also sees a great stage with a finish on top of Hautacam, after the climb of the legendary Tormalet. This stage is really going to be the first indication of who has the real yellow-jersey credentials.
We'll look at specific stages once the race is underway, as we preview or review the action (time permitting, of course).
But, since we're never shy for a prediction, however incorrect, we'll call Evans as this year's champion, with the other contenders to follow - that's a "run with the herd prediction!"
One final article on cycling, to follow up on yesterday's post on cycling's drug culture. We received the following story from George, which grows (pardon the pun) the legend of doping history of the Tour de France:
When Pierre Brambilla (a well known user of amphetamines)lost to Jean Robic on the last day of the Tour in 1947 he reportedly buried his bike at the bottom of his garden. When asked by a reporter about the incident, he replied sarcastically it was to grow bamboo for a new pair of wheels. "Good job you didn't plant your feeding bottles then," the journalist replied, "You'd have grown a pharmacy."
Join us for race opinion over the next three weeks!
Ross
Wimbledon preview: Men's final
Wimbledon preview: Federer vs. Nadal is still on...
I'll be praying fervently that both overcome their semi-final opponents and deliver us with the final we've all been waiting for. If they do, then the incredible statistic is that Federer and Nadal will have played in BOTH the French Open and Wimbledon Finals for the last three years in a row! It was back in 2006 that they first met on the grass, a month after Federer had lost to Nadal in Paris, and we've seen the same two finalists for the next two years. It's a remarkable run of dominance on two completely different surfaces, and is testimony to the quality of the game's two best players (or the relative weakness of the players behind them, take your pick!)
Federer knew two weeks ago that he'd be facing a tricky semi-final, but he would have thought it would be Novak Djokovic. Instead, he gets Marat Safin, who dumped Djokovic out in three sets in Round 2. Safin is perhaps one of four players Federer would genuinely fear (the others are Djokovic, Nalbandian and of course, Nadal), because on his day, Safin has weapons to beat him. A few years ago, in the Australian Open Semi-final, Safin made Federer look ordinary at times. Friday will be a tall order, however, because Federer is playing brilliant tennis at the moment.
His movement is exceptional, and the grass seems to highlight just how beautifully he moves. On the clay, ironically, movement seems to be one of the problems, whereas on grass, it's his biggest strength. So I'll pick Federer to win that semi-final, probably in four sets, but only if Safin serves really well. Otherwise it will be three relatively easy sets.
The other semi sees Nadal take on either Schuettler or Clement, who have yet to finish their quarter final (it's one set all). That should present few problems, and I'd expect a straight sets victory, setting up the big final (at least, I'm hoping for it!).
Nadal's quarterfinal victory over Andy Murray was a huge relief because he disposed of one of the game's biggest "Freudian-fascination" players, which is a pet hate of mine in the game. I wrote about these players a few weeks ago, who stare up at their psychological crutch...I mean support group, after pretty much every single point, win or lose. A winning point is usually accompanied by a fist-pump and a "Come on" shout, with an apparently longing look at their mother, girlfriend and coach for some divine intervention or affirmation - "Well done, son! You're the best, you can do it, etc.". Jelena Jankovic asks her coach whether she should challenge line calls, such is the apparent inability to think for herself on the court. Murray took the "Freudian tennis concept" to new levels when he beat Richard Gasquet in the previous round, after coming back from 2 sets down.
I've not seen that level of "dependency" in professional sports before. Little surprise then that Nadal, once he got on top, finished Murray off easily - there is no "family showboating" to be done when you're running back and forth chasing tennis balls for two hours. Of course, the British press believed they'd found the new world number 1. The morning after his win against Gasquet, the papers called him "Miracle Man". They should have run a picture of Gasquet and called him "Meltdown Man", because he blew the match more than Murray won it.
Murray himself spoke of his ambition to win Wimbledon THIS YEAR - bear in mind that he'd never even reached a quarter final and you see no lack of confidence there. That's not a bad thing of course, but he's so far behind the top 3 (and especially the top 2) that if his eyes are the title, he's looking the wrong way. So I was particularly pleased with Nadal's win last night.
As for the final, that's anyone's guess. I'd say Federer is still the favourite, only because it's grass and he's looking unchallenged. So too is Nadal, however, and if they perform at their best, it should be a great final. Perhaps the winner will be the player who performs closest to their true ability, thanks to the pressure of the match, and the expectation on both. Federer of course has a 6-0 hiding in Paris he'd no doubt like to forget, which might affect him. Nadal has the expectation and desire that might choke his own shot-making ability. Time will tell. I'm not calling the winner on this one (but let's just hope they do make the final!)
Ross
I'll be praying fervently that both overcome their semi-final opponents and deliver us with the final we've all been waiting for. If they do, then the incredible statistic is that Federer and Nadal will have played in BOTH the French Open and Wimbledon Finals for the last three years in a row! It was back in 2006 that they first met on the grass, a month after Federer had lost to Nadal in Paris, and we've seen the same two finalists for the next two years. It's a remarkable run of dominance on two completely different surfaces, and is testimony to the quality of the game's two best players (or the relative weakness of the players behind them, take your pick!)
Federer knew two weeks ago that he'd be facing a tricky semi-final, but he would have thought it would be Novak Djokovic. Instead, he gets Marat Safin, who dumped Djokovic out in three sets in Round 2. Safin is perhaps one of four players Federer would genuinely fear (the others are Djokovic, Nalbandian and of course, Nadal), because on his day, Safin has weapons to beat him. A few years ago, in the Australian Open Semi-final, Safin made Federer look ordinary at times. Friday will be a tall order, however, because Federer is playing brilliant tennis at the moment.
His movement is exceptional, and the grass seems to highlight just how beautifully he moves. On the clay, ironically, movement seems to be one of the problems, whereas on grass, it's his biggest strength. So I'll pick Federer to win that semi-final, probably in four sets, but only if Safin serves really well. Otherwise it will be three relatively easy sets.
The other semi sees Nadal take on either Schuettler or Clement, who have yet to finish their quarter final (it's one set all). That should present few problems, and I'd expect a straight sets victory, setting up the big final (at least, I'm hoping for it!).
Nadal's quarterfinal victory over Andy Murray was a huge relief because he disposed of one of the game's biggest "Freudian-fascination" players, which is a pet hate of mine in the game. I wrote about these players a few weeks ago, who stare up at their psychological crutch...I mean support group, after pretty much every single point, win or lose. A winning point is usually accompanied by a fist-pump and a "Come on" shout, with an apparently longing look at their mother, girlfriend and coach for some divine intervention or affirmation - "Well done, son! You're the best, you can do it, etc.". Jelena Jankovic asks her coach whether she should challenge line calls, such is the apparent inability to think for herself on the court. Murray took the "Freudian tennis concept" to new levels when he beat Richard Gasquet in the previous round, after coming back from 2 sets down.
I've not seen that level of "dependency" in professional sports before. Little surprise then that Nadal, once he got on top, finished Murray off easily - there is no "family showboating" to be done when you're running back and forth chasing tennis balls for two hours. Of course, the British press believed they'd found the new world number 1. The morning after his win against Gasquet, the papers called him "Miracle Man". They should have run a picture of Gasquet and called him "Meltdown Man", because he blew the match more than Murray won it.
Murray himself spoke of his ambition to win Wimbledon THIS YEAR - bear in mind that he'd never even reached a quarter final and you see no lack of confidence there. That's not a bad thing of course, but he's so far behind the top 3 (and especially the top 2) that if his eyes are the title, he's looking the wrong way. So I was particularly pleased with Nadal's win last night.
As for the final, that's anyone's guess. I'd say Federer is still the favourite, only because it's grass and he's looking unchallenged. So too is Nadal, however, and if they perform at their best, it should be a great final. Perhaps the winner will be the player who performs closest to their true ability, thanks to the pressure of the match, and the expectation on both. Federer of course has a 6-0 hiding in Paris he'd no doubt like to forget, which might affect him. Nadal has the expectation and desire that might choke his own shot-making ability. Time will tell. I'm not calling the winner on this one (but let's just hope they do make the final!)
Ross
Rabu, 02 Juli 2008
Tour de France 2008
3 weeks in July 2008: Are we optimistic to expect a clean tour?
The Tour de France begins on Saturday. And while I wish that I could be as optimistic and excited about it as I was perhaps five, maybe ten years ago, there is so much water under the bridge for cycling that my enthusiasm is drastically tempered by my cynicism!
It's true that so far in 2008, we've given cycling a very poor run here at The Science of Sport. In fact, I don't think we've done a single post on the sport, including through the Classics season and the Giro d'Italia! That's partly because there's been so much to write about in other areas, but it's also because, I must confess, the constant negative press, the deception and the farcical attitude of certain people within cycling has really put me off the sport a little - Pat McQuiade, the head of the UCI, last year denied that cycling had a doping problem, despite the fact that millions of dollars was being lost as sponsors pulled the plug on their riders.
So just as those sponsors decided to jump ship, I guess our own attitudes reflect the general malaise around the sport of cycling. The 2008 Tour will start without its defending champion, Alberto Contador, who happens to be on a team (Astana) with a track record of doping. It also starts without one of its great sprinters, Tom Boonen, who returned a positive test for cocaine recently. And then of course, it starts with memories of last year's Tour, where two high profile "heroes" were expelled for positive tests. And the memories of the last ten Tours, where drugs have never been far from the headlines.
However, since no one likes a cynic, we do eventually have to find some light, and so over the next few weeks, as cycling's greatest race unfolds, we'll focus on the action. Funny thing is, last year, we promised the same thing - as I recall, we did a series of posts leading up to the race on doping, but we promised that as soon as the racing began, we'd leave the doping and discuss only the action.
Turns out the action in 2007 was the doping! First it Landis, who didn't even take to the line, the first "Champion" to be stripped due to his 2006 positive test. Then was Vinokourov, one of the "heroes" of the sport, who tested positive and got the boot. Then it was Rasmussen, the yellow-jersey wearer, sacked from his team in sight of the finish line. And so the 2007 Tour, which began with much hope, ended as perhaps one of the three most controversial tours ever. Let's hope 2008 is not the same.
There is some light on the horizon, I'll concede. In what is a telling indictment on the sport (the UCI, that is), most of the pressure to "clean up cycling" has come from the free market - the sponsors, the media, the event "owners", and the riders themselves, who are sick of the negativity surrounding the sport. The "clean up" campaign includes profiling of athletes' blood to establish a baseline against which subsequent testing can be compared, and also the somewhat powerless committment by cyclists to race drug free. The talk has been loud and it has been positive. Whether this is a true revolution remains to be seen, because the culture of doping in cycling is so deep, it may take generations to remove.
A culture of doping in cycling: History tells a story
But since we have a few days until that action starts, I thought I would go back to a post that was done last year in the lead-up to the race, and rework it for now. That post concered the culture of doping in cycling, and how historically, cyclists have taken to drugs just as you or I would take to a Gatorade during our training runs or rides.
It was about last year this time that Bjarne Riis, the winner of the 1996 Tour, admitted to doping. The problem is that he does not appear to be an isolated case, and even within that race of 1996, the top 4 riders all have some sort of history or track record of doping. The same goes for every single winner of the Tour de France since 1996 - either they are known drug users, or they are rumoured to have doped (with plenty of circumstantial evidence), or they are currently being tried (as in the case of Floyd Landis). And so I wrote last year that the "deeper you dig, the uglier it gets" for the sport of cycling.
The first point is that the Tour de France must be one of the first sporting events where doping was practiced. As far back as the early 1900's, riders were drinking wine and using strychnine to "dull the pain". Then, with World War II came the introduction of amphetamines, which were initially created to assist soldiers in battle to remain alert and focused.
They were soon used by professional cyclists, among them Tom Simpson, who famously died near the summit of the Mont Ventoux in the 1960's. In the legendary book Put me back on my bike by William Fotheringham, Simpson is credited with the following quote:
“I know from the way they ride the next day that they are taking dope. I don’t want to have to take it – I have too much respect for my body – but if I don’t win a big event soon, I shall have to start taking it”
Also at this time, one of the men to have won the Tour five times, Jacques Anquetil, was in his prime. Anquetil perfected the use of “the Anquetil cocktail” comprising a painkiller, morphine or palfium, injected directly into painful muscles even whilst cycling; an amphetamine to offset the somnolent effect of morphine; and a sleeping tablet, Gardenal, to allow sleep when the stimulatory effects of the amphetamines were still active. Anquetil’s recorded comment is that:
“You would have to be an imbecile or a crook to imagine that a professional cyclist who races for 235 days a year can hold the pace without stimulants”
Anquetil also reportedly stated:
“For 50 years bike racers have been taking stimulants. Obviously we can do without them in a race, but then we will pedal 15 miles an hour (instead of 25). Since we are constantly asked to go faster and to make even greater efforts, we are obliged to take stimulants”
A final quote comes from a cyclist, Jesus Manzano (I do acknowledge that these quotes and statments are sometimes inspired by ulterior motives and might be sour-grapes, but given the number of them, they need to be heard), who was banned in 2004 for using doping products:
“They said that I was a rotten apple, but I now believe that the whole tree is rotten … When you train a lot your haematocrit goes down, so how is it possible for someone to go to the Dauphiné or the Giro with a (haematocrit) level of 52%. How do they get it up to this level? With EPO. But it’s the UCI’s (Union Cycliste Internationale) fault. Because they could sort it out very easily. They could take that cyclist to Lausanne, get him to spend a year training (without access to EPO) and see what happens. He won’t end up (with a haematocrit) at 52%, but at 38%. He won’t even be able to get out of bed. But it’s all a farce. The only ones who are getting rich are some of the doctors, and not the cyclists… I have a witness who said that one doctor was asking for six million pesetas (£30 000) to use his preparation methods. Will they be asking for six million for just aspirin and mineral salts?”
So this is the culture of the Tour de France, unfortunately. I once attended a presentation by Dr Alejandro Lucia from Spain, who was a research scientist of the Banesto team that included Miguel Indurain and Alex Zulle. His opinion on the matter was that to the cyclists, the use of doping products had become as acceptable as drinking Gatorade or some other energy drink during the race.
So just as you might plan to run a marathon or go for a long ride and feel that you can't do without some energy bars or gels, so too professional cyclists feel that doping is not an option but a necessity. And this may also be the reason why many cyclists can so easily deny the use of anything illegal - they genuinely believe that it's not illegal, just that it is necessary!
So when they say they have "done nothing wrong", they may actually believe it to be true, even when they might have used hormones or other drugs!
A final quote comes from the judge who presided over the doping case of Richard Virenque. His name is Judge Daniel Delegrove:
Much has happened in the last year since we ran the article that contained these quotes, including the disaster-Tour of 2007 with Vino and Rasmussen. And for the next few weeks, we're going to focus on the racing action, not the doping (unless the doping supercedes it again) with the optimistic belief that we may see a clean Tour for once.
There are interesting ways to analyse this, including estimations of the power output during the mountain stages - there's already some evidence that a typical climbing day in the multi-stage races is being done at a LOWER average power output than it was three years ago.
Also, the somewhat erratic performances of cyclists does tend to suggest a 'cleaner' Tour - the days of a dominant rider cycling away from the field day after day like a Terminator on wheels seem gone. Does that mean less doping? Who knows? It certainly suggests it, because the recovery of riders seems worse now than before, and putting in two big efforts in the mountains seems beyond the normal physiological capacity of the riders. Or is that just a weaker Tour without its big champions? I believe the more open, competitive racing is a reflection of a more even race, where a few riders don't have the clear upper hand they once had. Time will tell if that's true...
Join us over the Tour de France 3 weeks for a race round-up and opinions!
Ross
The Tour de France begins on Saturday. And while I wish that I could be as optimistic and excited about it as I was perhaps five, maybe ten years ago, there is so much water under the bridge for cycling that my enthusiasm is drastically tempered by my cynicism!
It's true that so far in 2008, we've given cycling a very poor run here at The Science of Sport. In fact, I don't think we've done a single post on the sport, including through the Classics season and the Giro d'Italia! That's partly because there's been so much to write about in other areas, but it's also because, I must confess, the constant negative press, the deception and the farcical attitude of certain people within cycling has really put me off the sport a little - Pat McQuiade, the head of the UCI, last year denied that cycling had a doping problem, despite the fact that millions of dollars was being lost as sponsors pulled the plug on their riders.
So just as those sponsors decided to jump ship, I guess our own attitudes reflect the general malaise around the sport of cycling. The 2008 Tour will start without its defending champion, Alberto Contador, who happens to be on a team (Astana) with a track record of doping. It also starts without one of its great sprinters, Tom Boonen, who returned a positive test for cocaine recently. And then of course, it starts with memories of last year's Tour, where two high profile "heroes" were expelled for positive tests. And the memories of the last ten Tours, where drugs have never been far from the headlines.
However, since no one likes a cynic, we do eventually have to find some light, and so over the next few weeks, as cycling's greatest race unfolds, we'll focus on the action. Funny thing is, last year, we promised the same thing - as I recall, we did a series of posts leading up to the race on doping, but we promised that as soon as the racing began, we'd leave the doping and discuss only the action.
Turns out the action in 2007 was the doping! First it Landis, who didn't even take to the line, the first "Champion" to be stripped due to his 2006 positive test. Then was Vinokourov, one of the "heroes" of the sport, who tested positive and got the boot. Then it was Rasmussen, the yellow-jersey wearer, sacked from his team in sight of the finish line. And so the 2007 Tour, which began with much hope, ended as perhaps one of the three most controversial tours ever. Let's hope 2008 is not the same.
There is some light on the horizon, I'll concede. In what is a telling indictment on the sport (the UCI, that is), most of the pressure to "clean up cycling" has come from the free market - the sponsors, the media, the event "owners", and the riders themselves, who are sick of the negativity surrounding the sport. The "clean up" campaign includes profiling of athletes' blood to establish a baseline against which subsequent testing can be compared, and also the somewhat powerless committment by cyclists to race drug free. The talk has been loud and it has been positive. Whether this is a true revolution remains to be seen, because the culture of doping in cycling is so deep, it may take generations to remove.
A culture of doping in cycling: History tells a story
But since we have a few days until that action starts, I thought I would go back to a post that was done last year in the lead-up to the race, and rework it for now. That post concered the culture of doping in cycling, and how historically, cyclists have taken to drugs just as you or I would take to a Gatorade during our training runs or rides.
It was about last year this time that Bjarne Riis, the winner of the 1996 Tour, admitted to doping. The problem is that he does not appear to be an isolated case, and even within that race of 1996, the top 4 riders all have some sort of history or track record of doping. The same goes for every single winner of the Tour de France since 1996 - either they are known drug users, or they are rumoured to have doped (with plenty of circumstantial evidence), or they are currently being tried (as in the case of Floyd Landis). And so I wrote last year that the "deeper you dig, the uglier it gets" for the sport of cycling.
The first point is that the Tour de France must be one of the first sporting events where doping was practiced. As far back as the early 1900's, riders were drinking wine and using strychnine to "dull the pain". Then, with World War II came the introduction of amphetamines, which were initially created to assist soldiers in battle to remain alert and focused.
They were soon used by professional cyclists, among them Tom Simpson, who famously died near the summit of the Mont Ventoux in the 1960's. In the legendary book Put me back on my bike by William Fotheringham, Simpson is credited with the following quote:
“I know from the way they ride the next day that they are taking dope. I don’t want to have to take it – I have too much respect for my body – but if I don’t win a big event soon, I shall have to start taking it”
Also at this time, one of the men to have won the Tour five times, Jacques Anquetil, was in his prime. Anquetil perfected the use of “the Anquetil cocktail” comprising a painkiller, morphine or palfium, injected directly into painful muscles even whilst cycling; an amphetamine to offset the somnolent effect of morphine; and a sleeping tablet, Gardenal, to allow sleep when the stimulatory effects of the amphetamines were still active. Anquetil’s recorded comment is that:
“You would have to be an imbecile or a crook to imagine that a professional cyclist who races for 235 days a year can hold the pace without stimulants”
Anquetil also reportedly stated:
“For 50 years bike racers have been taking stimulants. Obviously we can do without them in a race, but then we will pedal 15 miles an hour (instead of 25). Since we are constantly asked to go faster and to make even greater efforts, we are obliged to take stimulants”
A final quote comes from a cyclist, Jesus Manzano (I do acknowledge that these quotes and statments are sometimes inspired by ulterior motives and might be sour-grapes, but given the number of them, they need to be heard), who was banned in 2004 for using doping products:
“They said that I was a rotten apple, but I now believe that the whole tree is rotten … When you train a lot your haematocrit goes down, so how is it possible for someone to go to the Dauphiné or the Giro with a (haematocrit) level of 52%. How do they get it up to this level? With EPO. But it’s the UCI’s (Union Cycliste Internationale) fault. Because they could sort it out very easily. They could take that cyclist to Lausanne, get him to spend a year training (without access to EPO) and see what happens. He won’t end up (with a haematocrit) at 52%, but at 38%. He won’t even be able to get out of bed. But it’s all a farce. The only ones who are getting rich are some of the doctors, and not the cyclists… I have a witness who said that one doctor was asking for six million pesetas (£30 000) to use his preparation methods. Will they be asking for six million for just aspirin and mineral salts?”
So this is the culture of the Tour de France, unfortunately. I once attended a presentation by Dr Alejandro Lucia from Spain, who was a research scientist of the Banesto team that included Miguel Indurain and Alex Zulle. His opinion on the matter was that to the cyclists, the use of doping products had become as acceptable as drinking Gatorade or some other energy drink during the race.
So just as you might plan to run a marathon or go for a long ride and feel that you can't do without some energy bars or gels, so too professional cyclists feel that doping is not an option but a necessity. And this may also be the reason why many cyclists can so easily deny the use of anything illegal - they genuinely believe that it's not illegal, just that it is necessary!
So when they say they have "done nothing wrong", they may actually believe it to be true, even when they might have used hormones or other drugs!
A final quote comes from the judge who presided over the doping case of Richard Virenque. His name is Judge Daniel Delegrove:
"These are not racers, they are pedalling test-tubes"The 2008 Tour: Optimistic or naive?
Much has happened in the last year since we ran the article that contained these quotes, including the disaster-Tour of 2007 with Vino and Rasmussen. And for the next few weeks, we're going to focus on the racing action, not the doping (unless the doping supercedes it again) with the optimistic belief that we may see a clean Tour for once.
There are interesting ways to analyse this, including estimations of the power output during the mountain stages - there's already some evidence that a typical climbing day in the multi-stage races is being done at a LOWER average power output than it was three years ago.
Also, the somewhat erratic performances of cyclists does tend to suggest a 'cleaner' Tour - the days of a dominant rider cycling away from the field day after day like a Terminator on wheels seem gone. Does that mean less doping? Who knows? It certainly suggests it, because the recovery of riders seems worse now than before, and putting in two big efforts in the mountains seems beyond the normal physiological capacity of the riders. Or is that just a weaker Tour without its big champions? I believe the more open, competitive racing is a reflection of a more even race, where a few riders don't have the clear upper hand they once had. Time will tell if that's true...
Join us over the Tour de France 3 weeks for a race round-up and opinions!
Ross
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)